July 25. 2024. 2:49

The Daily

Read the World Today

Alec Baldwin pleads not guilty to involuntary manslaughter over fatal film set shooting

Alec Baldwin has pleaded not guilty to two charges of involuntary manslaughter over the death of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.

The Hollywood actor was due in court on Friday for a first appearance hearing, which would have seen details of the charges and his rights read out by a judge.

But Mr Baldwin entered the pleas on Thursday, waiving his right to a first appearance in court.

The actor will next face a preliminary hearing at a date yet to be set, which will determine whether or not the case will go to trial.

READ MORE

Six ways the invasion of Ukraine changed the EU


‘I turned around and saw a bullet had hit her. And a red patch appeared straight away on her sweater’

‘I turned around and saw a bullet had hit her. And a red patch appeared straight away on her sweater’

Russian address of Vienna security gathering prompts walkout and Ukrainian flag-waving

Russian address of Vienna security gathering prompts walkout and Ukrainian flag-waving

Denis Staunton: The power struggle to access the depths of South China Sea

Denis Staunton: The power struggle to access the depths of South China Sea

Mr Baldwin was charged by the Santa Fe District Attorney’s office last month, over the fatal shooting of Ms Hutchins in October 2021.

The first of the two charges brought against him can be referred to as involuntary manslaughter and requires proof of underlying negligence.

The second charge is involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act, which requires proof that there was more than simple negligence involved in a death.

The district attorney (DA) recently dropped a firearm enhancement to the charge, which would have made the crime punishable by a mandatory five years in jail.

Baldwin’s lawyers had argued that the enhancement was “unlawful” and accused the DA of “extraordinary” media briefings against him.

The actor’s legal team said that after the “legally erroneous” enhancement had been rescinded, their own previous motion to have the charge dropped was now “moot”.

In a withdrawal notice filed earlier this week, they said that since the firearm enhancement had carried “the greatest legal penalty” it should have demanded “careful consideration by the government”.

“Instead, a spokesperson for the government immediately issued an extraordinary statement to the media characterising the motion as an ‘attempt to distract’ from the case by Mr Baldwin’s ‘fancy attorneys’,” the notice stated.

Mr Baldwin also faces a separate civil lawsuit, filed on February 9th by the family of Ms Hutchins.

The family are suing Mr Baldwin and the Rust movie production company for alleged battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence and loss of consortium.

Loss of consortium is a claim which seeks to recover compensation for damage to certain relationships that are mutually dependent. – PA